четвъртък, 15 март 2012 г.

Global Youth Cultural Summit - Let's all meet in Jakarta in August!

GYCS (Global Youth Cultural Summit) is an international forum for youth to contribute their ideas to the fulfillment of the UN Millenium Development Goals due for 2015.


The event will be held on August 9-13, 2012 in Jakarta, Indonesia.
The summit will gather 400 youth, selected from all over the world through a YouTube video / essay competition (see Website for more details). Young people applying to GYCS are challenged to present a creative idea to help the fulfillment of one of the MDGs, leveraging their own cultural background and perspective in the process. The 8 best ideas will be presented at GYCS 2012 in Jakarta.
If you feel excited and wanna know more about GYCS,
just open http://www.gycs2012.com for further information .


Show up yourself and be the part of the world!!!

вторник, 21 февруари 2012 г.

Acting against ACTA


Bulgaria has become the sixth country that has refused to support the international Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA).The controversial agreement is sponsored by the US and Japan, and meant to toughen intellectual property rights enforcement, but critics say limits freedom of speech on the Internet.Bulgaria’s Economy and Energy Minister Traicho Traikov says Sofia will not ratify the agreement until the EU member states elaborate a joint position on the document.
Bulgarian authorities have made the decision to halt the already signed agreement after street protests. More than eight housand protesters marched through the capital Sofia and 16 other cities.In addition leading voices for intellectual property rights have expressed concerns about the credibility of the agreement.To add to this, the infamous hacker group “Anonymous”  has  threatened the Bulgarian government with multiple hacker attacks .
Minister Traicho Traikov told reporters he is pessimistic about helping the industry that has not adapted to digital age with sanctions instead of through market means.
Coverage of ACTA by the Bulgarian. media has been lacking, at least compared to SOPA and PIPA.  So far, protests of ACTA have been predominantly held in the country.  However, as more and more European governments start to reconsider ACTA in response to this past weekend’s protests, we may finally start to see some more coverage of this clandestine  agreement here in the Bulgaria.


неделя, 5 февруари 2012 г.

My road to RIO+20 - a pictorial story

            I'm Daniel, 25 years old  student and youth activist from Bulgaria and this is my story.

         I'm from a poor ex-communist state of Bulgaria,a country with the most energy intensive economy amongst all members of European Union.This explains my interest concerning sustainable development.Sustainable development has  been around for some forty years,but i first came to it 2007 in university(I study economics).I was interested in the subject,but it was not a love at first glance.Later that year i participated in a conference organized by my university.The topic was "Ecosystems, Environment and Sustainable Development in Bulgaria".I soon noticed that i was amongst the very few persons actually paying attention.I started to become interested in the subject,and started reading books and doing case studies and researches.(I've uploaded some interesting articles here - my new blog) .Later that year i  started internship in the Enterprise Europe Network(concerning technological transfers and green innovation)

Me receiving award for active participation
  My life changed significantly when i became involved in EU's Youth in action programme in late 2009.Most of the projects i got involved in were not covering sustainability topics,but some of them  were actually,and this further sparkled my interest.My first real project on the matter was in 2010 in Bulgaria a seminar and conference -The topic "Sustainability of transportation and reduction of road accidents". I was amongst the most decorated participants



Pillow fight flashmob.A creative way to express yourself
Sustainable development in Bulgaria,lecture;Romania 2011
In  late 2010 and early 2011 i was busy with studying but,nevertheless i was able to take part in numerous projects,some of them covering sustainable development.One particularly interesting project was a youth exchange in Romania,high up in the Carpathian mountains.Theme was poverty and unemployment eradication among young people.I have learned a lot about the way people live in those underdeveloped regions of the country.



We  have conducted flash mobs,demontrations,press conferences,meeting with various members of the municipality as well as some charity work too.Basicaly the aim was to promote the future development of the communities, using the social activism methods as a tool.
My life has changed significantly since then and i wanted to devote myself to the matter.


Later that year i joined another project in Bartin,Turkey. It was nice to see how people lived in such a remote region.The course had many topics,with sustainability being one of them.That had drawn my attention.We have to work closely and help locals out with their work.This has helped me  see how how poor people live and made me devoted even further to the cause.

Promoting poverty eradication; circa 2011


In late 2011 i traveled back to Romania in order to take part of another project.Social disclusion and poverty eradication.
The project’s methodology was based on the Council of Europe publications in the field of human rights education – Compass, Compasito, Education Pack, Companion, and Dominion.
During the activities, other educational perspectives were  integrated: participation, the experiential learning; the Co-operative learning and the facilitation.

събота, 4 февруари 2012 г.

Five myths about sustainable development in Bulgaria

  

Great article by Hanna Sankowska @

it's called "Kinda green: five myths about sustainable development in Bulgaria". Here it is:


Myth 1: ‘Bulgaria is not doing anything to be green’
Not true. On 10 December Ivelina Vasileva, the Bulgarian environment deputy minister, participated in the twelfth meeting of the International Commission for the Protection of the Danube in Vienna, to help protect the river and the Black Sea ecosystem. According to a recent Deutsche Bank report, Bulgaria is expected to significantly overachieve its Kyoto target of 8% below base 1988 emissions level for the period 2008-2012, potentially reaching 35% below base year level by 2010. Already in 2002, Bulgaria’s government created a new energy strategy, further strengthened by a 2007 bill promising to increase the share of energy produced from renewable sources. Sounds great? Curb your enthusiasm, because 1988 was still in the dark communist era times, with its environmental neglect and high level industrial pollution. Besides, even today most of Bulgaria’s energy is produced using lignite.
Myth 2: There are no environmentally sustainable companies in Bulgaria
Environmentally sustainable’ means zero environmental impact. Yet even the staunchest advocates realise that this is quite hard to achieve. ‘Until we reorient our economy to reflect biological metabolism, to be ‘cradle to cradle’ from ‘cradle to grave’, not much else can be effective,’ says Georgi Stefanov, 32, of the WWF (world wide fund for nature) NGO. ‘For every truck of laptops we produce eighteen trucks of waste!’ There are scarce international examples of truly environmentally sustainable companies, apart from Interface, a global carpet company annually inching closer to their goal of zero emissions.
Blinding colours?
 Green telecoms giant Globul tries to be in its street campaigns
Bulgarian businesses have their own ways to define ‘green’. For mining and industrials, green equals legally compliant: ‘It’s a cost game. They don’t want to be stuck with costly overpolluting fines or expensive legal battles,’ says Boyan Rashev, 32, managing partner at Denkstatt, a sustainability consultancy. For the large service players, green equals profit. Creative marketing techniques inflate their environmental accomplishments to gain a competitive edge with green-loving customers. Apart from just having a green logo, Telecom giant Globul also has an ambitious and comprehensive campaign: handset recycling, environmental heritage protection - you name it, they do it.
Myth 3: ‘Crisis is bad for the future of Bulgarian sustainable policies’
Once, green regulations were just necessary evils. Today, companies are doing anything to cut costs without losing a valuable work force. The easiest way to do it now in Bulgaria is to go green – sustainable policies reinforcing energy and resource use efficiency help them stay in business and protect jobs.
Myth 4: ‘Environmental sustainability relies mostly on industrial reform’
‘Europe’s 160 million buildings use 40% energy and produce 40% of emissions’, says Petar Tashev, 27, from Facilities magazine. Greening out the real estate is a very important step; in Europe it’s easier to make decisions regarding repairs and improving the energy efficiency of old residential buildings. ‘It will be a major hurdle here because unlike western Europe, where the landlord frequently owns an entire block of flats, Bulgaria has a strong tradition of personal flat ownership,’ says Tashev. For the renovation of buildings and facades, you have to ensure that all one hundred flat-owners agree to make that investment.
By 2018 all  newly built buildings in Europe need to be energy efficient
By 2018 all the newly built buildings in Europe need to be energy efficient, in line with a 2002 energy performance of buildings directive. After seven years in political limbo, this was finally re-launched by the European parliament and European commission in November 2009. In Bulgaria,  it will certainly mean changing more than the light bulbs. ‘When western companies want to buy an office building, they are looking for ones with central management systems and that are energy efficient,’ says Tashev.
Myth 5: ‘Businesses in Bulgaria don’t want to be green’
A grain of truth. More policies are needed to guide the transition from fossil fuels to renewable energies. ‘Our companies don’t want to be green. Our government doesn’t use the right mechanisms to make them want to be green,’ says Borislav Sandov, 26, from the green party. Rashev precises that government support should emphasise taxing the polluters. ‘There are ingenious projects in Bulgaria,’ says Rashev, ‘but not many hear about them. One industrial company uses molten copper heat to generate its own electricity which now covers their needs up to 40%. The best way? Encourage companies to go green their own way.’
The question for Bulgaria is how to continue building green momentum. They should learn the lessons from their more economically advanced peers in western Europe whose green policies are much more mature. It takes time and a multi-pronged approach suited to the specific locale. ‘With a web of very effective NGOs, you can involve other people to back your ideas and involve them as partners,’ says Stefanov. These bring the issues to the national stage, especially in Bulgaria, where no debates garner public interest without significant economic interests backing them.

Bulgaria and Europe 2020


Bulgaria, the country with the most energy-intensive economy in the European Union, would benefit from aligning itself with the 'Europe 2020' targets on reducing greenhouse gas emissions and boosting renewable energies, as inevitably the measures introduced would boost competitiveness, experts said. Dnevnik, EurActiv's partner in Bulgaria, reports.

Bulgaria should have ambitious objectives for cutting greenhouse gas emissions so that it can transform itself from an extremely energy-intensive economy into one that is at least competitive or close to the average, argues Georgi Stefanov, a climate change expert at the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) in Sofia.

Stefanov was referring to the EU's '20/20/20' targets for greenhouse gas emission reductions and boosting renewable energies, outlined in the EU's climate and energy package and adopted as part of the new 'Europe 2020' strategy for growth and jobs (see 'Background'). However, Bulgarian industry representatives consider these targets to be unrealistic.

Bulgaria is one of the leading countries in implementing the targets set out in the Kyoto Protocol. The reason for this is the restructuring of the country's economy following the collapse of the communist model, which brought about the closure of many heavy industries.

In an interview with Dnevnik, WWF's Stefanov said that implementing the targets of the EU's new strategy would stimulate the creation of new technologies, new employment opportunities and less CO2. However, he expressed fears that Bulgaria would not see opportunities to increase revenues and modernise businesses by making an effort to reach the targets.

If the targets imposed on Bulgaria are not reached, then industry will have to endure draconian financial restrictions and many badly-managed sectors will collapse – bringing more unemployment to the country, he warned.

Heavy industry and energy-producing sectors are most affected by reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. ''But as these sectors are well-informed about the compulsory measures to implement, my opinion is that in the coming years it will be the transport sector that will suffer much more from the restrictions,'' he said

Source: http://www.euractiv.com

Sustainability of Bulgarian agriculture

Sustainable development in terms of agriculture - short summary    

           The  concept  of  sustainability   of  agriculture spreads  very  fast  and  has been developed  in  different aspects such as biological, economic and social. The  most  popular  concept  of  sustainability is  related  to  ecology  and  says  that  a  farming  system  can  not  be  defined  as  sustainable  if  it harms the environment.According to other points of view, sustainability  is the capacity  for sufficient and non-decreasing with   time  production  of  food  products  per capita. The focus here is social and concentrates on  the  utilization  of  technical  progress  and market mechanisms.

       There  are  different  definitions  of  sustainable agriculture  but  they  usually do not  fully reflect its  essence  and  only  characterize  one  or  more of its aspects: either the resource, e.g. soil, or the institution on, e.g. semi-meat product on farms that  are  supported,  the  means  of  production and technologies, etc.

       A  Bulgarian  team  of  authors,  Velchev,  Valev and  Borisov  gave  the  following  definition  of sustainable  agriculture  (1997):  ”A  modern environmentally consistent sustainable agriculture practically means a strive to achieve the potential of  high  biological  value  yields  in  a  certain agrarian  ecological  area  by  means  of  adequate farming practices that would guarantee the best economic results in a market economy and at the same  time preserve and increase soil fertility and preserve the environment"

Sustainable development of Bulgarian agriculture

       Bulgarian agriculture is undergoing a reform. It is a well known fact that the collapse of  planned  economy  and  the  accompanying  crisis had  an  extremely  strong  effect  on  agriculture. From economical point of view it's apparent that the last  years have  lead  to  a  low-productive  system  of agriculture with high capital-output ratio that made  it  dependent  on  natural  and  climatic conditions, unstable and non-competitive.

    All in all,the  sector  is  in  stagnation  and  it  does  not  comply  with  sustainability   standards.  Its economic  development  is  unstable  and  does not  even  reach  half  of  its  potential.  The demographic characterics of rural population are deteriorating. Some environmental problems persist and new ones emerge. The questi on  is whether  agriculture  advances  to  sustainable development or, on the contrary, retreats. The answer  to  this  is not optimistic because  there are  a  growing  number  of  negative  symptoms parallel to the positive:

  • GDP  of  agriculture  was  stabilized  at  an average value rating well below its potential;
  •  The  export  of  farm  produce  has  increased about 7x compared to 1997, which showed that the  sector  is  geting  adapted  to  the  market economy but is still far from its potential
  • Labor  efficiency  is  low  and  maintains  this level;
  • farmland and LTA are not used to their full capacity ,  resulting  in  the  increase  of  capital-output ratio of farm products;
  • yields and productivity are low and unstable;
  • the income of rural population is increasing but at a slow rate;
  • the area of salinized, acidified and polluted soils is decreasing but erosion increases; manure is not properly utilized and therefore becomes an environmental pollutant.
           Bulgaria is a member of the European Union and has  adopted  the  Common  Agricultural  Policy. 



Farmers are now receiving direct payments per unit of area and are about to adopt European standards  of  quality ,  hygiene  and  humane treatment  of  animals  as  well  as  preservation of  environment  and,  moreover,  competing with  other  EU  producers.  Compliance  with the  requirements  for  sustainable  agriculture  is becoming a must and they have to be ready for this for the sake of prosperity .

 Sources:

1.Bashev,  C.,  Evaluation  of  Bulgarian  Farms Sustainability .  Agricultural  Economics  and
Management, 3, 2006.

2.Hajieva V.  Ph.D.Agriculture’s Sustainable Developmentin Bulgaria


Sustainability indicators - what are they?

            In its five-year 1996 – 2000 program, the United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development
(UNCSD)  offered  a  system  of  indicators  of  sustainability .  They  are  132  and  are  divided  into  four  categories:  social  –  39;  economic  – 23; environmental – 55 and instituonal – 15.
The proposed 132 indicators for the analysis of  sustainability  are  not  obligatory.  The  European Commission on Statistics has adopted 47 of them for the European Union for the reason that there is no reliable information for the rest of them. Complying with the requirements of Agenda 21 we could recognize  4  groups:  efficiency,  resource  utilization, financing of sustainable development and adoption of technologies and innovations.

Compilation and publication of indicators

It is hardly possible to give a reasonable overview of the large variety of national and international programs of compiling and publishing social, environmental and sustainable development indicators. In general these programs include some or all of the following topics:
Table 1. Environmental indicators of the European Union. (Source: <a href='http://reports.eea.europa.eu/signals-2004/en' class='external text' title='http://reports.eea.europa.eu/signals-2004/en' rel='nofollow'>EEA Signals 2004</a>)
Table 1. Environmental indicators of the European Union.
  • population (growth, migration, refugees)
  • human needs (health, food, housing, education, equity, security, etc.)
  • renewable and non-renewable natural resources
  • environmental quality (air, water, land)
  • ecosystems (acidification, eutrophication, biodiversity)
  • economic sectors (and their impacts, including emissions, natural resource use, production and consumption patterns, technologies)
  • natural and man-made disasters
  • global environmental problems (climate change, ozone layer depletion)
  • globalization
  • institutions.


 
The International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) maintains an online directory of “sustainable development indicators initiatives”; in March 2004, the directory included about 600 initiatives at national and international levels by governments, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and individuals.


       The problem of more or less lengthy indicator lists is comparability and aggregation. Integrative concepts of sustainable development or the state and trend of the environment require evaluation or combination of indicators capturing the ‘gist’ of these concepts. One method of evaluating indicator sets is summarizing the impression of their results in icons such as smiling faces  or traffic lights of red alert, yellow wait and see, and green o.k. Of course such evaluation is judgmental, and even more so when attempting an overall judgment:
    Among different aggregation methods, green accounting in a common physical or monetary unit and averaging indicators are most commonly applied. Green accounting of material flows and environmental cost is described elsewhere. Here the focus is on popular ad-hoc calculations of compound indices and their use and usefulness. 

Why do we need indicators?
 There are three basic functions of indicators - simplification, quantification, and communication. Indicators generally simplify in order to make complex phenomena quantifiable so that information can be communicated. Some of the general public are concerned about sustainable development and the environment. They like to be informed about the state of the environment and the economy and how and why they are changing.


Organizations involved with sustainability indicators

Commission for Sustainable Development http://www.sd-commission.org.uk/
Dow Jones Sustainability Indices http://www.sustainability-index.com/
Food and Agriculture Organisation http://www.fao.org/
Food Standards Agency http://www.foodstandards.gov.uk/
FTSE 4 GOOD http://www.ftse4good.com/Indices/index.jsp
International Institute for Environment and Development http://www.iied.org/
International Institute for Sustainable Development http://www.iisd.org/default.asp
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development http://www.oecd.org/
World Bank http://www.worldbank.org/






Sourses:

1.International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology
Volume 2, Issue 2, 1995 
2.Sustainability  Indicators. Report of the Project on Indicators of Sustainable Development, SCOPE 58, Edited by B. Moldan  and S. Billharz, 1997, Willay and Sons, Great Britain, 1977.